Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 and Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 963 vs 922
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.247 vs 0.23
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.219 vs 13.234
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.073 vs 0.049
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.772 vs 1.273
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 October 2009 vs 15 July 2008 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 963 vs 922 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.247 vs 0.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.219 vs 13.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.073 vs 0.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.448 vs 0.446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.772 vs 1.273 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
- Around 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 90°C
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 863 vs 830
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 302 vs 291
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 517 vs 505
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 90°C |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 863 vs 830 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 302 vs 291 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 517 vs 505 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P7550
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 963 | 922 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 830 | 863 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 291 | 302 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 505 | 517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.247 | 0.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.219 | 13.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.073 | 0.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.448 | 0.446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.772 | 1.273 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Penryn |
| Launch date | 1 October 2009 | 15 July 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 3214 | 3222 |
| Price now | $229.99 | $297.01 |
| Processor Number | P7550 | P8400 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.94 | 1.44 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $209 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.26 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 3072 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.26 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 410 million |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.150V | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35 mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | PGA478 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 25 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 with others
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P8400
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo SP9300
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550 vs
IntelCeleron Dual-Core SU2300
