Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 versus Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 et Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 35 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
- Environ 5% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.53 GHz versus 2.4 GHz
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1029 versus 942
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1000 versus 854
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 342 versus 306
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 618 versus 538
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.272 versus 0.261
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 21.389 versus 16.1
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.079 versus 0.074
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.509 versus 0.498
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.993 versus 1.788
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.53 GHz versus 2.4 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 6134 KB versus 3072 KB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1029 versus 942 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1000 versus 854 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 342 versus 306 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 618 versus 538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.272 versus 0.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 21.389 versus 16.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.079 versus 0.074 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.509 versus 0.498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.993 versus 1.788 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 942 | 1029 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 854 | 1000 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 306 | 342 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 538 | 618 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.261 | 0.272 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.1 | 21.389 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.074 | 0.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.498 | 0.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.788 | 1.993 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Penryn | Penryn |
| Date de sortie | 15 July 2008 | 15 July 2008 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $209 | $316 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3208 | 3168 |
| Prix maintenant | $49.18 | $69.95 |
| Processor Number | P8600 | T9400 |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 9.20 | 7.31 |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Taille de dé | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| Cache L2 | 3072 KB | 6134 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | 105°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.4 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 410 million | 410 million |
| Rangée de tension VID | 1.050V-1.150V | 1.050V-1.162V |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35 mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | PGA478, BGA479 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 avec des autres
IntelCore 2 Duo P8600 vs
IntelCeleron Dual-Core SU2300
IntelCore 2 Duo P8600 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P7550
IntelCore 2 Duo P8600 vs
IntelCore i3-2367M
