Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 versus Intel Core 2 Duo T8100
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 et Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.66 GHz versus 2.1 GHz
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1075 versus 832
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 937 versus 768
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 352 versus 295
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 600 versus 512
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.285 versus 0.23
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.672 versus 15.035
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.077 versus 0.075
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2009 versus 10 January 2008 |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.66 GHz versus 2.1 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1075 versus 832 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 937 versus 768 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 352 versus 295 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 600 versus 512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.285 versus 0.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.672 versus 15.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.077 versus 0.075 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T8100
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 | Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1075 | 832 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 937 | 768 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 352 | 295 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 600 | 512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.285 | 0.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.672 | 15.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.077 | 0.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.559 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.976 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 | Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Penryn | Penryn |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2009 | 10 January 2008 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $241 | $209 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3155 | 3158 |
| Prix maintenant | $56.99 | $999.99 |
| Processor Number | P8800 | T8100 |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 9.00 | 0.38 |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.66 GHz | 2.10 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Taille de dé | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
| Cache L2 | 3 MB | 3072 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | 105°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.66 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 410 million | 410 million |
| Rangée de tension VID | 1.00V-1.25V | 1.000V-1.250V |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | PGA478, BGA479 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 avec des autres
IntelCore 2 Duo P8800 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T9300
IntelCore 2 Duo P8800 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T8100
IntelCore 2 Duo P8800 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T9400
