Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 versus AMD Phenom II X4 B95
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 et AMD Phenom II X4 B95 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Mémoire. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 24.212 versus 7.417
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.248 versus 0.316
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.253 versus 3.481
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.212 versus 7.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.248 versus 0.316 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.253 versus 3.481 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Phenom II X4 B95
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1242 versus 1182
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2401 versus 2138
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 386 versus 382
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1280 versus 1222
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.2 versus 0.676
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.167 versus 0.138
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1242 versus 1182 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2401 versus 2138 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 386 versus 382 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1280 versus 1222 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.2 versus 0.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.167 versus 0.138 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 B95
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 | AMD Phenom II X4 B95 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1182 | 1242 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2138 | 2401 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 382 | 386 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1222 | 1280 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.676 | 3.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.212 | 7.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 | 0.167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.248 | 0.316 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.253 | 3.481 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 | AMD Phenom II X4 B95 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Yorkfield | Deneb |
| Date de sortie | Q3'09 | October 2009 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2891 | 2900 |
| Processor Number | Q9505 | |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | AMD Business Class - AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD Phenom | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $80 | |
| OPN Tray | HDXB95WFK4DGM | |
| Prix maintenant | $72.95 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.95 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Taille de dé | 164 mm2 | 258 mm |
| Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 71.4°C | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 456 million | 758 million |
| Rangée de tension VID | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L2 | 512 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L3 | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3 GHz | |
| Ouvert | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Prise courants soutenu | LGA775 | AM3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | |
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 avec des autres
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9505 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo E6320
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9505 vs
IntelPentium Dual-Core E2180
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9505 vs
IntelCeleron E1400
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9505 vs
AMDPhenom II X4 B95
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9505 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 450
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9505 vs
AMDFX-4100
