Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs AMD Phenom II X4 B95
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 und AMD Phenom II X4 B95 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Kompatibilität, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Speicher. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 24.212 vs 7.417
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.248 vs 0.316
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.253 vs 3.481
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.212 vs 7.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.248 vs 0.316 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.253 vs 3.481 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Phenom II X4 B95
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1242 vs 1182
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2401 vs 2138
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 386 vs 382
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1280 vs 1222
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.2 vs 0.676
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.167 vs 0.138
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1242 vs 1182 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2401 vs 2138 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 386 vs 382 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1280 vs 1222 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.2 vs 0.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.167 vs 0.138 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 B95
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 | AMD Phenom II X4 B95 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1182 | 1242 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2138 | 2401 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 382 | 386 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1222 | 1280 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.676 | 3.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.212 | 7.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.138 | 0.167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.248 | 0.316 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.253 | 3.481 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 | AMD Phenom II X4 B95 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Yorkfield | Deneb |
| Startdatum | Q3'09 | October 2009 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2891 | 2900 |
| Processor Number | Q9505 | |
| Serie | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | AMD Business Class - AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD Phenom | |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $80 | |
| OPN Tray | HDXB95WFK4DGM | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $72.95 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 14.95 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Matrizengröße | 164 mm2 | 258 mm |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 71.4°C | |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 456 million | 758 million |
| VID-Spannungsbereich | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3 GHz | |
| Freigegeben | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | LGA775 | AM3 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Speicher |
||
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 | |
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505 mit anderen
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9505 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo E6320
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9505 vs
IntelPentium Dual-Core E2180
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9505 vs
IntelCeleron E1400
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9505 vs
AMDPhenom II X4 B95
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9505 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 450
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9505 vs
AMDFX-4100
