Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 versus AMD Athlon II X4 631
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 et AMD Athlon II X4 631 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Mémoire. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
- Environ 2% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 71.4°C versus 70.10°C
- Environ 5% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 95 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1216 versus 1115
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2349 versus 2118
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 412 versus 342
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1299 versus 1125
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30.904 versus 10.376
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.258 versus 0.401
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.476 versus 4.046
| Caractéristiques | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 71.4°C versus 70.10°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1216 versus 1115 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2349 versus 2118 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 versus 342 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 versus 1125 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 versus 10.376 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 versus 0.401 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 versus 4.046 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Athlon II X4 631
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 32 nm versus 45 nm
- 5.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.611 versus 0.612
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.196 versus 0.175
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 32 nm versus 45 nm |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.611 versus 0.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.196 versus 0.175 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
CPU 2: AMD Athlon II X4 631
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | AMD Athlon II X4 631 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1216 | 1115 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2349 | 2118 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 342 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 | 1125 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | 3.611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 | 10.376 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 | 0.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 | 0.401 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 | 4.046 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | AMD Athlon II X4 631 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Yorkfield | Llano |
| Date de sortie | Q1'08 | August 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3027 | 3031 |
| Numéro du processeur | Q9550 | |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | AMD Athlon II X4 |
| Statut | Discontinued | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD Athlon Processors | |
| OPN PIB | AD631XWNGXBOX | |
| OPN Tray | AD631XWNZ43GX | |
| Prix maintenant | $80 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.61 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Fréquence de base | 2.83 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Taille de dé | 214 mm2 | 228 mm |
| Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 71.4°C | 70.10°C |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 820 million | 1178 million |
| Rangée de tension VID | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
| Cache L1 | 512 KB | |
| Cache L2 | 4 MB | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.6 GHz | |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | |
| Ouvert | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Dimensions du boîtier | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Prise courants soutenu | LGA775 | FM1 uPGA |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | |