Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 versus AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W)
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 et AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W) pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Mémoire. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 412 versus 399
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30.904 versus 14.5
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.258 versus 0.394
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.476 versus 4.125
| Référence | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 versus 399 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 versus 14.5 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 versus 0.394 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 versus 4.125 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W)
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1333 versus 1299
- 5.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.576 versus 0.612
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.212 versus 0.175
| Référence | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1333 versus 1299 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.576 versus 0.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.212 versus 0.175 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W)
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1216 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2349 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 399 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 | 1333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | 3.576 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 | 14.5 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 | 0.212 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 | 0.394 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 | 4.125 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Yorkfield | Deneb |
| Date de sortie | Q1'08 | July 2009 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3027 | 3262 |
| Processor Number | Q9550 | |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Taille de dé | 214 mm2 | 258 mm |
| Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 71.4°C | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 820 million | 758 million |
| Rangée de tension VID | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L2 | 512 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L3 | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3 GHz | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Prise courants soutenu | LGA775 | AM3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | |
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 avec des autres
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelPentium D 950
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDAthlon II X4 640
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDAthlon II X4 631
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCeleron J1850
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCeleron J1800
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDA4-4020
