Intel Core i5-5675C versus Intel Celeron G3920
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i5-5675C et Intel Celeron G3920 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-5675C
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Environ 24% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.60 GHz versus 2.9 GHz
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2234 versus 1781
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 5606 versus 2358
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3147 versus 766
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3649 versus 1680
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 2091
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3147 versus 766
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3649 versus 1680
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 2091
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.60 GHz versus 2.9 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2234 versus 1781 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5606 versus 2358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3147 versus 766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3649 versus 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 2091 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3147 versus 766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3649 versus 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 2091 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron G3920
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 32 GB
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 51 Watt versus 65 Watt
- 3.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 3432 versus 989
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 5672 versus 3577
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 32 GB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 3432 versus 989 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5672 versus 3577 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-5675C
CPU 2: Intel Celeron G3920
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i5-5675C | Intel Celeron G3920 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2234 | 1781 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5606 | 2358 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 989 | 3432 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3577 | 5672 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.323 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 75.856 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.432 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.601 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.401 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3147 | 766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3649 | 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 2091 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3147 | 766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3649 | 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 2091 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i5-5675C | Intel Celeron G3920 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Broadwell | Skylake |
| Date de sortie | Q2'15 | September 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1275 | 1307 |
| Processor Number | i5-5675C | G3920 |
| Série | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $60 | |
| Prix maintenant | $62.45 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.69 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.10 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.60 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 2 |
| Taille de dé | 150 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L2 | 256 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L3 | 4096 KB (shared) | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 65 °C | |
| Compte de transistor | 1400 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
| Soutien de la mémoire ECC | ||
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x1622 | 0x1902 |
| eDRAM | 128 MB | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 950 MHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® Iris® Pro Graphics 6200 | Intel® HD Graphics 510 |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 950 MHz | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | N / A |
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur WiDi | 1080p | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 37 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 2.10 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 51 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCA 2013D | PCG 2015C (65W) |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | 16 |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i5-5675C avec des autres
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCore i7-4770S
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCeleron G3920
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDPRO A6-8550B
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDAthlon 240GE
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCeleron G4930
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDAthlon 3000G
