Intel Core i5-8250U versus AMD A9-9400 SoC
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i5-8250U et AMD A9-9400 SoC pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-8250U
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Environ 42% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.40 GHz versus 2.4 GHz
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1889 versus 1199
- 4.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 5826 versus 1332
- 9.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.131 versus 2.759
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 280.161 versus 49.738
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.947 versus 11.848
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.385 versus 21.079
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1688 versus 894
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3199 versus 1799
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5401 versus 5100
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1688 versus 894
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3199 versus 1799
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5401 versus 5100
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 August 2017 versus May 2016 |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.40 GHz versus 2.4 GHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1889 versus 1199 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5826 versus 1332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.131 versus 2.759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 280.161 versus 49.738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.947 versus 11.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.385 versus 21.079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 versus 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 versus 1799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5401 versus 5100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 versus 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 versus 1799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5401 versus 5100 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A9-9400 SoC
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 15 Watt
| Cache L2 | 1024 KB (per core) versus 1 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 15 Watt |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-8250U
CPU 2: AMD A9-9400 SoC
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i5-8250U | AMD A9-9400 SoC |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1889 | 1199 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5826 | 1332 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 770 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2911 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1696 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.131 | 2.759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 280.161 | 49.738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.755 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.947 | 11.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.385 | 21.079 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 | 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 | 1799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5401 | 5100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 | 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 | 1799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5401 | 5100 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i5-8250U | AMD A9-9400 SoC | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Kaby Lake R | Stoney Ridge |
| Date de sortie | 21 August 2017 | May 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $297 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 986 | 1542 |
| Processor Number | i5-8250U | |
| Série | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | |
| Taille de dé | 123 mm | 124 mm |
| Cache L1 | 256 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB | 1024 KB (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 6 MB | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 72 °C | 74 °C |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.40 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 8 | |
| Compte de transistor | 1200 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 34.1 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x5917 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 32 GB | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® UHD Graphics 620 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 10 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 25 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.80 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 42mm X 24mm | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FC-BGA1356 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 12 | |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i5-8250U avec des autres
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
IntelCore i7-6650U
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
IntelCore i7-7820HQ
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
AMDRX-418GD
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
IntelCore i3-1115G4E
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
AMDRyzen 3 7320U
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
AMDAthlon Gold 7220U
