Intel Core i5-8265U versus Intel Core i7-4960HQ
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i5-8265U et Intel Core i7-4960HQ pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-8265U
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 4 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.90 GHz versus 3.80 GHz
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 3.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 47 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 908 versus 889
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.164 versus 4.937
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 296.492 versus 83.321
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.652 versus 0.641
- 8.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.731 versus 2.182
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.943 versus 5.984
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 August 2018 versus 1 September 2013 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.90 GHz versus 3.80 GHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 47 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 908 versus 889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.164 versus 4.937 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 296.492 versus 83.321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.652 versus 0.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.731 versus 2.182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.943 versus 5.984 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i7-4960HQ
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2088 versus 2044
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 6366 versus 5877
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3297 versus 2803
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4832 versus 3208
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7935 versus 5740
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4832 versus 3208
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7935 versus 5740
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2088 versus 2044 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6366 versus 5877 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3297 versus 2803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4832 versus 3208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7935 versus 5740 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4832 versus 3208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7935 versus 5740 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-8265U
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4960HQ
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i5-8265U | Intel Core i7-4960HQ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2044 | 2088 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5877 | 6366 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 908 | 889 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2803 | 3297 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2529 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.164 | 4.937 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 296.492 | 83.321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.652 | 0.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.731 | 2.182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.943 | 5.984 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1665 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3208 | 4832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5740 | 7935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1665 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3208 | 4832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5740 | 7935 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i5-8265U | Intel Core i7-4960HQ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Whiskey Lake | Crystal Well |
| Date de sortie | 21 August 2018 | 1 September 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 964 | 952 |
| Prix maintenant | $297 | $623 |
| Numéro du processeur | i5-8265U | i7-4960HQ |
| Série | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Statut | Launched | Launched |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.04 | 4.62 |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $657 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Fréquence de base | 1.60 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Taille de dé | 123 mm | 260 mm |
| Cache L1 | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Cache L3 | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 72 °C | 100 °C |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | 100°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.90 GHz | 3.80 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 8 | 8 |
| Compte de transistor | 1700 Million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 37.5 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR3L 1333/1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x3EA0 | 0xD26 |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.30 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® UHD Graphics 620 | Intel® Iris® Pro Graphics 5200 |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.3 GHz | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | 2880x1800@60Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 10 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 25 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.80 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Dimensions du boîtier | 46x24 | 37.5mm x 32mm x 1.65mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1528 | FCBGA1364 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 47 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | 16 |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | 1x16 or 2x8 or 1x8 2x4 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Mémoire Intel® Optane™ prise en charge | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Éligibilité à la plateforme Intel® vPro™ | ||
| Technologie Speed Shift | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i5-8265U avec des autres
IntelCore i5-8265U vs
IntelCore i7-9750HF
IntelCore i5-8265U vs
IntelCore i7-8565UC
IntelCore i5-8265U vs
IntelCore i3-1125G4
IntelCore i5-8265U vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V2718
IntelCore i5-8265U vs
AMDRyzen 3 7320U
IntelCore i5-8265U vs
AMDRyzen 5 7520U
