Intel Core i5-8265U vs Intel Core i7-4960HQ
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i5-8265U und Intel Core i7-4960HQ Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-8265U
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 3% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.90 GHz vs 3.80 GHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 3.1x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 47 Watt
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 908 vs 889
- 5.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.164 vs 4.937
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 296.492 vs 83.321
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.652 vs 0.641
- 8.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.731 vs 2.182
- 5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.943 vs 5.984
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 21 August 2018 vs 1 September 2013 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.90 GHz vs 3.80 GHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 47 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 908 vs 889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.164 vs 4.937 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 296.492 vs 83.321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.652 vs 0.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.731 vs 2.182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.943 vs 5.984 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i7-4960HQ
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2087 vs 2051
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 6363 vs 5911
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3297 vs 2803
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4832 vs 3208
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7935 vs 5740
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4832 vs 3208
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7935 vs 5740
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2087 vs 2051 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6363 vs 5911 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3297 vs 2803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4832 vs 3208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7935 vs 5740 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4832 vs 3208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7935 vs 5740 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-8265U
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4960HQ
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-8265U | Intel Core i7-4960HQ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2051 | 2087 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5911 | 6363 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 908 | 889 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2803 | 3297 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2529 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.164 | 4.937 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 296.492 | 83.321 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.652 | 0.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.731 | 2.182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.943 | 5.984 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1665 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3208 | 4832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5740 | 7935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1665 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3208 | 4832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5740 | 7935 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i5-8265U | Intel Core i7-4960HQ | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Whiskey Lake | Crystal Well |
| Startdatum | 21 August 2018 | 1 September 2013 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 974 | 958 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $297 | $623 |
| Processor Number | i5-8265U | i7-4960HQ |
| Serie | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 8.04 | 4.62 |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $657 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Matrizengröße | 123 mm | 260 mm |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 72 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.90 GHz | 3.80 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 | 8 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1700 Million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 37.5 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR3L 1333/1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x3EA0 | 0xD26 |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.30 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® UHD Graphics 620 | Intel® Iris® Pro Graphics 5200 |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1.3 GHz | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | 2880x1800@60Hz | |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 10 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 25 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.80 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 46x24 | 37.5mm x 32mm x 1.65mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1528 | FCBGA1364 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 47 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | 1x16 or 2x8 or 1x8 2x4 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i5-8265U mit anderen
IntelCore i5-8265U vs
IntelCore i5-8250U
IntelCore i5-8265U vs
AMDRX-418GD
IntelCore i5-8265U vs
IntelCore i7-8565UC
IntelCore i5-8265U vs
IntelCore i3-1115G4E
IntelCore i5-8265U vs
AMDRyzen 3 7320U
IntelCore i5-8265U vs
AMDAthlon Gold 7220U
