Intel Core m3-8100Y versus Intel Core i5-7267U
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core m3-8100Y et Intel Core i5-7267U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core m3-8100Y
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 5.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 28 Watt
- 7.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.615 versus 2.623
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 187.542 versus 45.958
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.044 versus 0.357
- 9.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.025 versus 1.312
- 6.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.936 versus 3.148
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2018 versus 3 January 2017 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 28 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.615 versus 2.623 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 187.542 versus 45.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.044 versus 0.357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.025 versus 1.312 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.936 versus 3.148 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-7267U
- Environ 3% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.50 GHz versus 3.40 GHz
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 16 GB
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1970 versus 1714
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3631 versus 2869
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3183 versus 1215
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3018 versus 2139
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5839 versus 3974
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3183 versus 1215
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3018 versus 2139
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5839 versus 3974
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.50 GHz versus 3.40 GHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 16 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1970 versus 1714 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3631 versus 2869 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3183 versus 1215 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3018 versus 2139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5839 versus 3974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3183 versus 1215 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3018 versus 2139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5839 versus 3974 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core m3-8100Y
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-7267U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core m3-8100Y | Intel Core i5-7267U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1714 | 1970 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2869 | 3631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.615 | 2.623 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 187.542 | 45.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.044 | 0.357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.025 | 1.312 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.936 | 3.148 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1215 | 3183 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2139 | 3018 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3974 | 5839 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1215 | 3183 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2139 | 3018 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3974 | 5839 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 868 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1978 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core m3-8100Y | Intel Core i5-7267U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Amber Lake Y | Kaby Lake |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2018 | 3 January 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1190 | 1201 |
| Processor Number | m3-8100Y | i5-7267U |
| Série | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ m Processors | 7th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $304 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.10 GHz | 3.10 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | 4 GT/s OPI |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| Cache L2 | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Cache L3 | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | 100°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.40 GHz | 3.50 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 29.8 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x591C | 0x5927 |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 900 MHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® UHD Graphics 615 | Intel® Iris® Plus Graphics 650 |
| eDRAM | 64 MB | |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.05 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@30Hz |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 4.5 W | 23 W |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 8 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.60 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 20mm X 16.5mm | 42x24x1.3 |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1515 | BGA1356 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 28 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 10 | 12 |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core m3-8100Y avec des autres
IntelCore m3-8100Y vs
IntelCore i7-6820HK
IntelCore m3-8100Y vs
AMDRyzen 3 3350U
IntelCore m3-8100Y vs
IntelN95
IntelCore m3-8100Y vs
AMDAthlon PRO 300U
IntelCore m3-8100Y vs
AMDAthlon Silver 7120U
IntelCore m3-8100Y vs
IntelCore i3-N300
