Intel Core m3-8100Y vs Intel Core i5-7267U
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core m3-8100Y und Intel Core i5-7267U Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core m3-8100Y
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 7 Monat(e) später
- 5.6x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 5 Watt vs 28 Watt
- 7.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.615 vs 2.623
- 4.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 187.542 vs 45.958
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.044 vs 0.357
- 9.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.025 vs 1.312
- 6.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.936 vs 3.148
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 30 August 2018 vs 3 January 2017 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 28 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.615 vs 2.623 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 187.542 vs 45.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.044 vs 0.357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.025 vs 1.312 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.936 vs 3.148 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-7267U
- Etwa 3% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.50 GHz vs 3.40 GHz
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1964 vs 1702
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3616 vs 2864
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3183 vs 1215
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3018 vs 2139
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5839 vs 3974
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3183 vs 1215
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3018 vs 2139
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5839 vs 3974
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.50 GHz vs 3.40 GHz |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1964 vs 1702 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3616 vs 2864 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3183 vs 1215 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3018 vs 2139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5839 vs 3974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3183 vs 1215 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3018 vs 2139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5839 vs 3974 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core m3-8100Y
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-7267U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core m3-8100Y | Intel Core i5-7267U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1702 | 1964 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2864 | 3616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.615 | 2.623 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 187.542 | 45.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.044 | 0.357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.025 | 1.312 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.936 | 3.148 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1215 | 3183 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2139 | 3018 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3974 | 5839 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1215 | 3183 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2139 | 3018 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3974 | 5839 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 868 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1978 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core m3-8100Y | Intel Core i5-7267U | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Amber Lake Y | Kaby Lake |
| Startdatum | 30 August 2018 | 3 January 2017 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1263 | 1264 |
| Processor Number | m3-8100Y | i5-7267U |
| Serie | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ m Processors | 7th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $304 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.10 GHz | 3.10 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | 4 GT/s OPI |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.40 GHz | 3.50 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 29.8 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x591C | 0x5927 |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 900 MHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® UHD Graphics 615 | Intel® Iris® Plus Graphics 650 |
| eDRAM | 64 MB | |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1.05 GHz | |
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@30Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 4.5 W | 23 W |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 8 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.60 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 20mm X 16.5mm | 42x24x1.3 |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1515 | BGA1356 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 5 Watt | 28 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 10 | 12 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core m3-8100Y mit anderen
IntelCore m3-8100Y vs
IntelCore i5-7267U
IntelCore m3-8100Y vs
AppleA12 Bionic
IntelCore m3-8100Y vs
AMDRyzen 3 3350U
IntelCore m3-8100Y vs
AMDAthlon PRO 300U
IntelCore m3-8100Y vs
AMDAthlon Silver 7120U
IntelCore m3-8100Y vs
IntelAtom x7425E
