Intel Core m5-6Y54 versus Intel Celeron 2955U
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core m5-6Y54 et Intel Celeron 2955U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core m5-6Y54
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Environ 93% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.70 GHz versus 1.4 GHz
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 2x plus de la cache L3, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L3 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 4.5 Watt versus 15 Watt
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1298 versus 782
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2271 versus 880
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 9.242 versus 4.611
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 936 versus 543
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 936 versus 543
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 versus 1 October 2013 |
Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
Fréquence maximale | 2.70 GHz versus 1.4 GHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
Cache L3 | 4 MB versus 2048 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt versus 15 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1298 versus 782 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2271 versus 880 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.242 versus 4.611 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 936 versus 543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 936 versus 543 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron 2955U
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.591 versus 5.976
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 89.427 versus 27.951
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.544 versus 0.222
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.088 versus 1.195
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1735 versus 1454
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2943 versus 2634
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1735 versus 1454
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2943 versus 2634
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.591 versus 5.976 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 89.427 versus 27.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.544 versus 0.222 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.088 versus 1.195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1735 versus 1454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2943 versus 2634 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1735 versus 1454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2943 versus 2634 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core m5-6Y54
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 2955U
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Core m5-6Y54 | Intel Celeron 2955U |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1298 | 782 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2271 | 880 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.976 | 6.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 27.951 | 89.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.222 | 0.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.195 | 5.088 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.242 | 4.611 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 936 | 543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1454 | 1735 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2634 | 2943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 936 | 543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1454 | 1735 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2634 | 2943 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 303 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 569 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Core m5-6Y54 | Intel Celeron 2955U | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Skylake | Haswell |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2015 | 1 October 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $281 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2171 | 2179 |
Processor Number | M5-6Y54 | 2955U |
Série | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ m Processors | Intel® Celeron® Processor 2000 Series |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.40 GHz |
Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
Taille de dé | 99 mm | 118 mm |
Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
Cache L2 | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Cache L3 | 4 MB | 2048 KB |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | 100°C |
Fréquence maximale | 2.70 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 2 |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 105 °C | |
Compte de transistor | 1400 million | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 29.8 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
Graphiques |
||
Device ID | 0x191E | |
Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 900 MHz | 1.00 GHz |
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 900 MHz | 1 GHz |
Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 16 GB | |
Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 515 | Intel HD Graphics |
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
DVI | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
Résolution maximale sur eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096@2304@24Hz | |
Résolution maximale sur VGA | N / A | |
Résolution maximale sur WiDi | 1080p | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibilité |
||
Configurable TDP-down | 3.5 W | |
Configurable TDP-up | 7 W | |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 20mm X 16.5mm | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm |
Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1515 | FCBGA1168 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 10 | 10 |
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 2.0 |
PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | 4x1, 1x4, 1x2 |
IDE integré | ||
LAN integré | ||
Nombre maximale des ports SATA 6 Gb/s | 2 | |
Nombre des ports USB | 4 | |
Soutien de PCI | ||
Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 | |
UART | ||
Révision USB | 3.0 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
Idle States | ||
Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
HD Audio | ||
Technologie Intel® Active Management (AMT) | ||
Intel® ME Firmware Version | 9.5 | |
Technologie Intel® Rapid Storage (RST) | ||
Matrix Storage | ||
Smart Connect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |