Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 versus Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 et Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
- Environ 27% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.92 GHz versus 2.3 GHz
- 6x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1203 versus 899
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1193 versus 834
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 362 versus 272
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 696 versus 474
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.31 versus 0.226
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 24.171 versus 7.743
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.097 versus 0.058
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.621 versus 0.387
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.253 versus 1.639
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 2.92 GHz versus 2.3 GHz |
Cache L2 | 6134 KB versus 1024 KB |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1203 versus 899 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1193 versus 834 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 362 versus 272 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 696 versus 474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.31 versus 0.226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.171 versus 7.743 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.097 versus 0.058 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.621 versus 0.387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.253 versus 1.639 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 899 | 1203 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 834 | 1193 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 272 | 362 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 474 | 696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.226 | 0.31 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.743 | 24.171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.058 | 0.097 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.387 | 0.621 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.639 | 2.253 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Penryn | Penryn |
Date de sortie | 10 January 2009 | 1 January 2009 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3238 | 3086 |
Processor Number | T4500 | T9800 |
Série | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $530 | |
Prix maintenant | $423.89 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.40 | |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 2.30 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
Taille de dé | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 1066 MHz |
Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
Cache L2 | 1024 KB | 6134 KB |
Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Fréquence maximale | 2.3 GHz | 2.92 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
Compte de transistor | 410 million | 410 million |
Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | |
Compatibilité |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Prise courants soutenu | PGA478 | PGA478, BGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |