Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 versus Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 et Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
- Environ 8% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.3 GHz versus 2.13 GHz
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 904 versus 837
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 824 versus 783
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.387 versus 0.362
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.3 GHz versus 2.13 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 904 versus 837 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 824 versus 783 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 474 versus 473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.387 versus 0.362 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
- 3x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 278 versus 272
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.231 versus 0.226
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 13.657 versus 7.743
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.066 versus 0.058
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.679 versus 1.639
| Caractéristiques | |
| Cache L2 | 3072 KB versus 1024 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 278 versus 272 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.231 versus 0.226 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.657 versus 7.743 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.066 versus 0.058 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.679 versus 1.639 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 | Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 904 | 837 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 824 | 783 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 272 | 278 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 474 | 473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.226 | 0.231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.743 | 13.657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.058 | 0.066 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.387 | 0.362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.639 | 1.679 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 | Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Penryn | Penryn |
| Date de sortie | 10 January 2009 | 1 January 2009 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3228 | 3241 |
| Processor Number | T4500 | P7450 |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
| Prix maintenant | $39.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.44 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.30 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Taille de dé | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
| Cache L2 | 1024 KB | 3072 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.3 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 410 million | 410 million |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
| Rangée de tension VID | 1.050V-1.150V | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Prise courants soutenu | PGA478 | PGA478 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 avec des autres
IntelPentium Dual Core T4500 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo SL9400
IntelPentium Dual Core T4500 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P7450
IntelPentium Dual Core T4500 vs
IntelAtom N470
