AMD FirePro S7100X versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro S7100X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro S7100X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 92.54 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- 3.2x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 640
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,961 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 1000x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.888 versus 42.463
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1283.973 versus 642.715
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.781 versus 2.933
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 70.708 versus 26.532
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 315.677 versus 133.458
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 25 May 2016 versus 18 February 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 92.54 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 640 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,961 gflops versus 1,389 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.888 versus 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1283.973 versus 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.781 versus 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.708 versus 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.677 versus 133.458 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Environ 41% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 723 MHz
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 100 Watt
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 723 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S7100X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FirePro S7100X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.888 | 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1283.973 | 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.781 | 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.708 | 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.677 | 133.458 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FirePro S7100X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | Amethyst | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 25 May 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 706 | 707 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
Prix maintenant | $299.01 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 723 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,961 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 92.54 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 60 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 1,870 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |