AMD Radeon 540X Mobile versus Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon 540X Mobile and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon 540X Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- 3.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1124 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1219 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- 10.7x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 48
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3100 versus 2780
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3100 versus 2780
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8361 versus 7349
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 versus 1 September 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1124 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1219 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 versus 48 |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3100 versus 2780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3100 versus 2780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3343 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8361 versus 7349 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1884 versus 1349
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1884 versus 1349
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 versus 284
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1739 versus 1425
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 versus 1349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 versus 1349 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 versus 284 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1739 versus 1425 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 540X Mobile
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon 540X Mobile | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3100 | 2780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3100 | 2780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1349 | 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1349 | 1884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3343 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8361 | 7349 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 284 | 363 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1425 | 1739 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon 540X Mobile | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | Lexa | Coffee Lake GT3e |
Conception | Radeon 500X Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 | 1 September 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 926 | 1044 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1219 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 8 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1124 MHz | 300 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1.25 TFLOPs | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 48 |
Pixel fill rate | 9.80 GP/s | |
Render output units | 8 | |
Stream Processors | 512 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.00 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 32 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 48 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 / DDR4 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |