AMD Radeon HD 7850 versus AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7850 and AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7850
- Environ 38% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 55.04 GTexel / s versus 40 GTexel / s
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 1024 versus 640
- Environ 38% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,761 gflops versus 1,280 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 7% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1200 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3885 versus 2174
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 567 versus 462
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.041 versus 33.836
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1028.005 versus 506.712
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.41 versus 3.01
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 72.975 versus 49.787
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 249.482 versus 153.657
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6173 versus 3707
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6173 versus 3707
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1312 versus 711
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55.04 GTexel / s versus 40 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,761 gflops versus 1,280 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1200 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3885 versus 2174 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 versus 462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.041 versus 33.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1028.005 versus 506.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.41 versus 3.01 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 72.975 versus 49.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 249.482 versus 153.657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6173 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6173 versus 3707 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1312 versus 711 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
- Environ 80% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4524 versus 3696
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 14630 versus 3351
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4524 versus 3696
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 14630 versus 3351
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4524 versus 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 14630 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4524 versus 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 14630 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7850
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7850 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3885 | 2174 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 | 462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.041 | 33.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1028.005 | 506.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.41 | 3.01 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 72.975 | 49.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 249.482 | 153.657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6173 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 14630 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6173 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 14630 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1312 | 711 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14263 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon HD 7850 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Pitcairn | Cape Verde |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 5 March 2012 | 15 February 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | $159 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 520 | 557 |
| Prix maintenant | $449.59 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,761 gflops | 1,280 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
| Stream Processors | 1200 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55.04 GTexel / s | 40 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 1,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 210 mm | 210 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 153.6 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1200 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||


