NVIDIA Quadro P1000 versus AMD Radeon HD 7850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and AMD Radeon HD 7850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 48% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1480 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 8% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 59.2 GTexel / s versus 55.04 GTexel / s
- Environ 8% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,894 gflops versus 1,761 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 47 Watt versus 225 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 4.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4464 versus 3867
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 596 versus 564
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 versus 47.041
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 versus 6173
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 versus 6173
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1591 versus 1312
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 versus 5 March 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 GTexel / s versus 55.04 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,894 gflops versus 1,761 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4464 versus 3867 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 versus 564 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 versus 47.041 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 versus 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 versus 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 versus 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 versus 3696 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 versus 1312 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7850
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 512
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1028.005 versus 832.248
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.41 versus 4.039
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 72.975 versus 65.117
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 249.482 versus 245.081
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 512 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1028.005 versus 832.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.41 versus 4.039 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 72.975 versus 65.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 249.482 versus 245.081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3348 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4464 | 3867 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 | 564 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | 47.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | 1028.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | 4.41 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | 72.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | 249.482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 | 1312 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GP107 | Pitcairn |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 | 5 March 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $375 | $249 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 530 | 533 |
| Prix maintenant | $319.99 | $449.59 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.53 | 11.01 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,894 gflops | 1,761 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.2 GTexel / s | 55.04 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 2,800 million |
| Stream Processors | 1200 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 210 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P1000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDFirePro M6000
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIATesla K40c
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
