AMD Radeon HD 7850 versus AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7850 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7850
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 72.975 versus 69.23
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 March 2012 versus 31 January 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 72.975 versus 69.23 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 63% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 89.6 GTexel / s versus 55.04 GTexel / s
- Environ 75% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1024
- Environ 63% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,867 gflops versus 1,761 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 4% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1250 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.74 versus 47.041
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1177.395 versus 1028.005
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.685 versus 4.41
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 versus 249.482
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 versus 6173
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 versus 6173
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1914 versus 1312
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 89.6 GTexel / s versus 55.04 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 1024 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,867 gflops versus 1,761 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 versus 47.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 versus 1028.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 versus 4.41 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 versus 249.482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 versus 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 versus 6173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 versus 1312 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7850
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7850 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3871 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.041 | 63.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1028.005 | 1177.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.41 | 5.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 72.975 | 69.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 249.482 | 343.81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6173 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6173 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1312 | 1914 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon HD 7850 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Pitcairn | Tahiti |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 5 March 2012 | 31 January 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | $449 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 535 | 536 |
| Prix maintenant | $449.59 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,761 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1792 |
| Stream Processors | 1200 | 1792 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55.04 GTexel / s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 4,313 million |
| Unités de Compute | 28 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 210 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 153.6 GB/s | 240 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1200 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon HD 7850 avec des autres
AMDRadeon HD 7850 vs
ATIRadeon X700 PRO
AMDRadeon HD 7850 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870
AMDRadeon HD 7850 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950
AMDRadeon HD 7850 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
AMDRadeon HD 7850 vs
NVIDIATesla K40c
AMDRadeon HD 7850 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
