NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 versus AMD Radeon HD 7850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 and AMD Radeon HD 7850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 134 billion / sec versus 55.04 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1024
- Environ 89% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,333 gflops versus 1,761 gflops
- 5.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7012 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5917 versus 3866
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.824 versus 47.041
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1089.67 versus 1028.005
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.899 versus 4.41
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7412 versus 6173
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7412 versus 6173
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2136 versus 1312
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 versus 5 March 2012 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 134 billion / sec versus 55.04 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 1024 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops versus 1,761 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5917 versus 3866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.824 versus 47.041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 versus 1028.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 versus 4.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 versus 6173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 versus 6173 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2136 versus 1312 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7850
- Environ 2% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 230 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 versus 559
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 72.975 versus 44.06
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 249.482 versus 103.884
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 230 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 versus 559 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 72.975 versus 44.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 249.482 versus 103.884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3340 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5917 | 3866 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 | 564 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17915 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.824 | 47.041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1089.67 | 1028.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.899 | 4.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.06 | 72.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.884 | 249.482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7412 | 6173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7412 | 6173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2136 | 1312 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | AMD Radeon HD 7850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GK104 | Pitcairn |
Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 | 5 March 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $249 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 532 | 533 |
Prix maintenant | $449.99 | $449.59 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.45 | 11.01 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops | 1,761 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 134 billion / sec | 55.04 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 2,800 million |
Stream Processors | 1200 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 210 mm |
Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224.3 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync |