AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X versus AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1475 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 377.6 GTexel/s versus 345.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 78565 versus 71273
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 839 versus 797
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13369 versus 12891
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1475 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 377.6 GTexel/s versus 345.6 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78565 versus 71273 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 839 versus 797 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13369 versus 12891 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1572 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13339 versus 13123
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13339 versus 13123
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1572 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 versus 13123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 versus 13123 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13123 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13123 | 13339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78565 | 71273 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 839 | 797 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13369 | 12891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1729.558 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Vega 10 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 23 June 2017 | 27 June 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 200 | 229 |
Genre | Workstation | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1475 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 64 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1250 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 755.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 24.17 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.08 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4096 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 94.40 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 377.6 GTexel/s | 345.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12500 million | 12,500 million |
Performance á point flottant | 11,059 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 402.4 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 2048 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 1572 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |