AMD Radeon R5 M430 versus NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 M430 and NVIDIA GeForce 920M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R5 M430

versus

NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M430

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1030 MHz versus 954 MHz
Environ 66% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 20.6 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 659.2 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
4.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 versus 119
Environ 37% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5084 versus 3722
Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.812 versus 8.358
Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.981 versus 0.843
Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.55 versus 15.374
Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 65.872 versus 40.443

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	15 May 2016 versus 13 March 2015
Vitesse du noyau	1030 MHz versus 954 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	20.6 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
Performance á point flottant	659.2 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	516 versus 119
Geekbench - OpenCL	5084 versus 3722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	13.812 versus 8.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.981 versus 0.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	18.55 versus 15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	65.872 versus 40.443

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 716 versus 649
Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 157.606 versus 144.604
Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 versus 1087
3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 versus 1157
Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2212
Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 versus 1087
3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 versus 1157
Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 2212

Caractéristiques
Pipelines	384 versus 320
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	716 versus 649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	157.606 versus 144.604
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1598 versus 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3636 versus 1157
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 versus 2212
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1598 versus 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3636 versus 1157
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 versus 2212

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M430
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

649

716

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

516

119

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5084

3722

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13.812

8.358

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

144.604

157.606

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.981

0.843

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18.55

15.374

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

65.872

40.443

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1087

1598

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1157

3636

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2212

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1087

1598

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1157

3636

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2212

3358

Nom	AMD Radeon R5 M430	NVIDIA GeForce 920M
PassMark - G3D Mark	649	716
PassMark - G2D Mark	516	119
Geekbench - OpenCL	5084	3722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	13.812	8.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	144.604	157.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.981	0.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	18.55	15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	65.872	40.443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1087	1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1157	3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2212	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1087	1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1157	3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2212	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		326

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD Radeon R5 M430	NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Essentiel
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler 2.0
Nom de code	Exo	GK208B
Date de sortie	15 May 2016	13 March 2015
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1182	1297
Genre	Laptop	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	855 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1030 MHz	954 MHz
Performance á point flottant	659.2 gflops	297.6 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	320	384
Taux de remplissage de la texture	20.6 GTexel / s	12.4 GTexel / s
Compte de transistor	1,040 million	585 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		33 Watt
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 3.0
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB	4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	14.4 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 Bit	64 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire	DDR3	DDR3
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
DirectCompute 5.0
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers