AMD Radeon R5 M430 versus NVIDIA GeForce 940M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 M430 and NVIDIA GeForce 940M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M430
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 versus 154
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 May 2016 versus 13 March 2015 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 versus 154 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1072 MHz versus 1030 MHz
- Environ 38% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1176 MHz versus 855 MHz
- Environ 37% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.22 GTexel / s versus 20.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- Environ 37% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 903.2 gflops versus 659.2 gflops
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1127 versus 649
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5982 versus 5084
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.98 versus 13.812
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 168.449 versus 144.604
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.307 versus 0.981
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.837 versus 18.55
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 versus 65.872
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 versus 1087
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 versus 1157
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 2212
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 versus 1087
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 versus 1157
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 2212
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz versus 1030 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz versus 855 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s versus 20.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops versus 659.2 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1127 versus 649 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5982 versus 5084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 versus 13.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 versus 144.604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 versus 0.981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 versus 18.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 versus 65.872 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 versus 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 versus 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 2212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 versus 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 versus 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 2212 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M430
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | NVIDIA GeForce 940M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 649 | 1127 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 | 154 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5084 | 5982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.812 | 25.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.604 | 168.449 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.981 | 1.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.55 | 21.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 65.872 | 101.399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1087 | 2132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1157 | 3065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2212 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1087 | 2132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1157 | 3065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2212 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R5 M430 | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | Exo | GM108 |
Date de sortie | 15 May 2016 | 13 March 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1182 | 1184 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 855 MHz | 1176 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1030 MHz | 1072 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 659.2 gflops | 903.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.6 GTexel / s | 28.22 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |