AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) versus AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 65% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 66.08 GTexel / s versus 40 GTexel / s
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 896 versus 640
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 79% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 125 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 6.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- 4.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 65217 versus 14263
- 2.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1730 versus 711
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55 versus 33.836
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 970.421 versus 506.712
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.656 versus 3.01
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 versus 49.787
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 237.944 versus 153.657
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 versus 15 February 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.08 GTexel / s versus 40 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 versus 640 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 versus 14263 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 versus 711 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 versus 33.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 versus 506.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 versus 3.01 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 versus 49.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 versus 153.657 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
- 581.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,280 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs
| Performance á point flottant | 1,280 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 | 14263 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 | 711 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 | 33.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 | 506.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 | 3.01 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 | 49.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 | 153.657 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2174 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3707 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4524 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 14630 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3707 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4524 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 14630 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Baffin | Cape Verde |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 | 15 February 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $86 | $159 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 673 | 557 |
| Prix maintenant | $179.50 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 26.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 14 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.2 TFLOPs | 1,280 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 640 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.08 GTexel / s | 40 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 1,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| VGA | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 210S
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
ATIRadeon X550
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon R9 260 OEM
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
