AMD Radeon RX 5500 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5500 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1670 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1845 MHz versus 1770 MHz
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 250 Watt
Date de sortie | 7 Oct 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1670 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1845 MHz versus 1770 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 versus 8803
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 versus 766
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 versus 42314
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 versus 12069
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 versus 12069
- 2.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 versus 4813
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 versus 8803 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 versus 766 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 versus 42314 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 versus 12069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 versus 12069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 versus 4813 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5500 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8803 | 18872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 | 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42314 | 74179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 | 13943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5500 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
Date de sortie | 7 Oct 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 257 | 112 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Nom de code | TU102 | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1845 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 22 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1670 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.4 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.2 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 59 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 1408 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 162.36 GT/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 18,600 million |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 |