AMD Radeon RX 560X versus AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 560X and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 560X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1175 MHz versus 926 MHz
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1275 MHz versus 1206 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 81.60 GTexel/s versus 154.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 60% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 6% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 6600 MHz
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4873 versus 2443
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4873 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 1674
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 1674
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 versus 4 August 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1175 MHz versus 926 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1275 MHz versus 1206 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 81.60 GTexel/s versus 154.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 6600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4873 versus 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4873 versus 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 1674 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 1024
- Environ 88% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4.9 TFLOPs versus 2.6 TFLOPs
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 versus 5698
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 versus 5698
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 versus 669
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7979 versus 3553
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 33724 versus 16474
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 1024 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs versus 2.6 TFLOPs |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 versus 5698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 versus 5698 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 versus 669 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7979 versus 3553 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33724 versus 16474 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 560X | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5698 | 9983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5698 | 9983 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 669 | 724 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3553 | 7979 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16474 | 33724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4873 | 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4873 | 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1674 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 835 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 560X | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 21 | Ellesmere |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500X Series | Radeon RX 400 Series |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | 4th Gen |
| Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 | 4 August 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 398 | 395 |
| Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Prix maintenant | $109.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1275 MHz | 1206 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 14/16 | 32 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1175 MHz | 926 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.6 TFLOPs | 4.9 TFLOPs |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 896/1024 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 81.60 GTexel/s | 154.4 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 5,700 million |
| GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 170 mm | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 211 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 6600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 560X avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 560X vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
AMDRadeon RX 560X vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5725
AMDRadeon RX 560X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M XT
AMDRadeon RX 560X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 560X vs
AMDFirePro W8100
AMDRadeon RX 560X vs
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Desktop)
