AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus AMD FirePro W7170M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD FirePro W7170M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 9 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1465 MHz versus 723 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 248.4 GT/s versus 92.54 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 4.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14497 versus 3162
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 versus 418
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 66235 versus 50809
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11536 versus 6796
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11536 versus 6796
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 2 October 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz versus 723 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s versus 92.54 GTexel / s |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14497 versus 3162 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 versus 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66235 versus 50809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 versus 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 versus 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 versus 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 versus 3362 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W7170M
- Environ 80% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 180 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7170M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD FirePro W7170M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14497 | 3162 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66235 | 50809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3362 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD FirePro W7170M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 10 | Amethyst |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 2 October 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 177 | 420 |
Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | 723 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 5,000 million |
Performance á point flottant | 2,961 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | None |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro |