AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1465 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1680 MHz
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14500 versus 14148
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 versus 750
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 versus 3131.344
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 135.923
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8499 versus 7488
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 7 January 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1680 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14500 versus 14148 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 versus 750 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 versus 3131.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 versus 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 135.923 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 versus 7488 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Environ 13% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 180 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 70661 versus 66240
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.337 versus 209.509
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 versus 1036.448
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 11536
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3723
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3366
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 11536
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3723
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3366
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70661 versus 66240 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 versus 209.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 versus 1036.448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 11536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 11536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3366 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14500 | 14148 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 | 750 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66240 | 70661 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 220.337 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 3131.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 135.923 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1141.283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 6714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 6714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 | 7488 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | $349 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 177 | 150 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1680 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 10,800 million |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
| Pipelines | 1920 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
| Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 229 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
IntelArc A730M
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
