AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 122.268 versus 119.148
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1890.261 versus 1373.562
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.121 versus 8.694
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.008 versus 21.766
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 625.621 versus 454.799
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 versus 19 July 2016 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 versus 119.148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 versus 1373.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 versus 8.694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 versus 21.766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 versus 454.799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1168 MHz
- Environ 33% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1709 MHz versus 1284 MHz
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 7000 MHz
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10075 versus 7682
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 versus 662
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35361 versus 34632
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 versus 9258
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 versus 9258
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4208 versus 3755
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1168 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz versus 1284 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10075 versus 7682 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 versus 662 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35361 versus 34632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 versus 9258 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4208 versus 3755 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7682 | 10075 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 662 | 749 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34632 | 35361 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 | 119.148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 1373.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 8.694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 | 21.766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 | 454.799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3755 | 4208 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GP106 |
Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 | 19 July 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 356 | 346 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1284 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 4,400 million |
Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 250 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |