AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP versus NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.008 versus 21.354
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 3333
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 3333
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 versus 2 August 2016 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 versus 21.354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 versus 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 versus 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3333 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1417 MHz versus 1168 MHz
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1531 MHz versus 1284 MHz
- Environ 43% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 10008 MHz versus 7000 MHz
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 67348 versus 34598
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.792 versus 122.268
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2368.267 versus 1890.261
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.829 versus 10.121
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 992.132 versus 625.621
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10841 versus 9258
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10841 versus 9258
- 2.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2243 versus 849
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1417 MHz versus 1168 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1531 MHz versus 1284 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10008 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 67348 versus 34598 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 versus 122.268 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2368.267 versus 1890.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 versus 10.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 versus 625.621 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10841 versus 9258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10841 versus 9258 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2243 versus 849 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7657 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34598 | 67348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 | 165.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 2368.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 17.829 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 | 21.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 | 992.132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 10841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 10841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 | 2243 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GP102 |
| Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 | 2 August 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 358 | 359 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1284 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz | 1417 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 11,800 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 10,974 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 342.9 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 480.4 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
