AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP versus NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and NVIDIA Quadro M5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1168 MHz versus 861 MHz
- Environ 24% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1284 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 6% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 6612 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 666 versus 661
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34620 versus 29528
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 122.268 versus 99.169
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1890.261 versus 1183.119
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.121 versus 7.899
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.008 versus 53.364
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 625.621 versus 498.551
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 versus 3677
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 3324
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 versus 3677
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 3324
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 versus 29 June 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz versus 861 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1284 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 6612 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 666 versus 661 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34620 versus 29528 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 versus 99.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 versus 1183.119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 versus 7.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 versus 53.364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 versus 498.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 versus 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 versus 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3324 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M5000
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9393 versus 7674
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12524 versus 9258
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12524 versus 9258
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9393 versus 7674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12524 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12524 versus 9258 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7674 | 9393 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 666 | 661 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34620 | 29528 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 | 99.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 1183.119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 7.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 | 53.364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 | 498.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 12524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 12524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3751 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GM204 |
Date de sortie | 15 October 2018 | 29 June 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 346 | 345 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,856.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $1,498 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.47 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1284 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1168 MHz | 861 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 4,252 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 132.9 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo, 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Largeur | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 6612 MHz |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |