AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1406 MHz versus 1215 MHz
- Environ 22% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1677 MHz versus 1379 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 429.30 GTexel/s versus 176.5 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 4096 versus 2048
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19324 versus 14915
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19324 versus 14915
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2017 versus 27 June 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1406 MHz versus 1215 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1677 MHz versus 1379 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 429.30 GTexel/s versus 176.5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 2048 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19324 versus 14915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19324 versus 14915 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- 412.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,648 gflops versus 13.7 TFLOPs
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 345 Watt
- 4.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 versus 3723
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 versus 3723
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 versus 3362
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 versus 3362
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,648 gflops versus 13.7 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 345 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 versus 3723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 versus 3723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 versus 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 versus 3362 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19324 | 14915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19324 | 14915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 8902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 8902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 8048 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 8048 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9859 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41233 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2293.496 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.704 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 692.9 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Vega 10 | GP104 |
| Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2017 | 27 June 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 219 | 221 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1677 MHz | 1379 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 64 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1406 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 13.7 TFLOPs | 5,648 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 107.30 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 429.30 GTexel/s | 176.5 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 256 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 345 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 7,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 282 mm | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 1000 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | None |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
IntelArc A310
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
AMDRadeon 740M
