AMD Radeon VII versus AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon VII and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon VII
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1400 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1750 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 13% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 432.24 GT/s versus 384.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 6% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16398 versus 12285
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 792 versus 731
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 91678 versus 66605
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 206.353 versus 174.714
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 versus 3924.968
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.606 versus 17.305
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3680
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3336
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3680
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3336
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2019 versus 10 July 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1750 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 432.24 GT/s versus 384.0 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16398 versus 12285 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 792 versus 731 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 91678 versus 66605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 versus 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 versus 3924.968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 versus 17.305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3336 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 3840
- Environ 30% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 230 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 versus 69.256
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 versus 499.927
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13848 versus 11724
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13848 versus 11724
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 4096 versus 3840 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 versus 69.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 versus 499.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13848 versus 11724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13848 versus 11724 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon VII
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon VII | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16398 | 12285 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 792 | 731 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 91678 | 66605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 | 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 | 3924.968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 | 17.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.256 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 499.927 | 1226.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11724 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11724 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2304 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon VII | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Vega 20 | Vega 10 |
Conception | AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega | |
Génération GCN | 5th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 7 February 2019 | 10 July 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $1,599 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 237 | 202 |
Prix maintenant | $699.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1750 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 60 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.46 TFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.8 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 115.26 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 3840 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 432.24 GT/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 230 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,230 million | 12,500 million |
Performance á point flottant | 12,288 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 305 mm | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 W | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 1024 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |