Intel UHD Graphics 770 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 770
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1450 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 23.20 GTexel/s versus 78.4 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 28 nm
- 9.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 140 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 versus 487
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.442 versus 30.505
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 versus 705.293
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.941 versus 35.416
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.384 versus 62.69
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 4 Nov 2021 versus 6 September 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1450 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.20 GTexel/s versus 78.4 billion / sec |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 140 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 versus 487 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 versus 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 versus 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 versus 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.384 versus 62.69 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- 3.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 3.8x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 256
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 versus 1908
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 versus 7628
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 versus 2.846
- 18.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 versus 72
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 256 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 versus 1908 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 versus 7628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 versus 2.846 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 versus 72 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 | 487 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1908 | 4017 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7628 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.846 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.384 | 62.69 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 72 | 1307 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Alder Lake GT1 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 4 Nov 2021 | 6 September 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 832 | 740 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1450 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 32 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1485 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 742.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | 960 |
| Pixel fill rate | 11.60 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.20 GTexel/s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192-bit GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 770 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 380 XGL
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7600
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
ATIFirePro 2260 PCI
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570X
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
