NVIDIA GRID M40 versus Intel HD Graphics 4400
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GRID M40 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID M40
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 930 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.064 versus 7.844
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 576.664 versus 154.696
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.529 versus 9.084
- 10.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.629 versus 8.335
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 May 2016 versus 3 September 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 930 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.064 versus 7.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 576.664 versus 154.696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.529 versus 9.084 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.629 versus 8.335 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4400
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 50 Watt
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M40
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GRID M40 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.064 | 7.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 576.664 | 154.696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.529 | 9.084 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.629 | 8.335 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GRID M40 | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 7.5 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | Haswell GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 18 May 2016 | 3 September 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1418 | 1421 |
| Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 930 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 392 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 46 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 20 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
