Intel UHD Graphics 615 versus NVIDIA GRID M40
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 615 and NVIDIA GRID M40 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 615
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 10x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 50 Watt
| Date de sortie | 7 November 2018 versus 18 May 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID M40
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 930 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.064 versus 18.422
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 576.664 versus 221.42
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.529 versus 12.354
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.629 versus 19.644
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 930 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.064 versus 18.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 576.664 versus 221.42 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.529 versus 12.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.629 versus 19.644 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M40
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | NVIDIA GRID M40 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 723 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 178 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3236 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.422 | 28.064 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 221.42 | 576.664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.26 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.354 | 18.529 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.644 | 87.629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1256 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1720 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1772 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1256 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1720 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1772 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 615 | NVIDIA GRID M40 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 7 November 2018 | 18 May 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1417 | 1418 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | |
| Mémoire partagé | Yes | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 615 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7200 GS
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 285
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1600M
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
AMDFirePro S4000X
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620M
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAGRID M40
