NVIDIA GeForce 930MX versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 930MX and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 60% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 24.48 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 783.4 gflops versus 366.3 gflops
- Environ 12% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 17 Watt versus 19 Watt
- 1800x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1288 versus 623
- 2.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5533 versus 1946
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.565 versus 6.705
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 165.338 versus 100.391
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.09 versus 0.441
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2053 versus 977
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3577 versus 1494
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 1833
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2053 versus 977
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3577 versus 1494
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 1833
- 2.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 495 versus 192
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 March 2016 versus 27 March 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.48 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 783.4 gflops versus 366.3 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt versus 19 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1288 versus 623 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5533 versus 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 versus 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.338 versus 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.09 versus 0.441 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2053 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 versus 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2053 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 versus 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 495 versus 192 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 versus 195
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 952 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 versus 195 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1288 | 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5533 | 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 | 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.338 | 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.09 | 0.441 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2053 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2053 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 495 | 192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | GM108 | GK208B |
Date de sortie | 1 March 2016 | 27 March 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1100 | 1488 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1020 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 952 MHz | 954 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 783.4 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.48 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 19 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Compte de transistor | 292 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |