NVIDIA GeForce 940MX versus AMD Radeon R5 M430
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and AMD Radeon R5 M430 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 993 MHz versus 855 MHz
- Environ 16% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 23.83 GTexel / s versus 20.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- Environ 16% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 762.6 gflops versus 659.2 gflops
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1516 versus 649
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6325 versus 5084
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.91 versus 13.812
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 312.94 versus 144.604
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.83 versus 0.981
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.833 versus 18.55
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.937 versus 65.872
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 versus 1087
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 versus 1157
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 2212
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 versus 1087
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 versus 1157
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 2212
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 versus 15 May 2016 |
Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz versus 855 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.83 GTexel / s versus 20.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops versus 659.2 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 versus 649 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 versus 5084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 versus 13.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 versus 144.604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 versus 0.981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 versus 18.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 versus 65.872 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 versus 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 versus 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 2212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 versus 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 versus 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 2212 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M430
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1030 MHz versus 954 MHz
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 versus 172
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1030 MHz versus 954 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 versus 172 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M430
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | AMD Radeon R5 M430 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 | 649 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 516 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | 5084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | 13.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | 144.604 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 0.981 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | 18.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | 65.872 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 | 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 | 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 | 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 | 1157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2212 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GM108 | Exo |
Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 | 15 May 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1071 | 1182 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | 855 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.83 GTexel / s | 20.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
DirectCompute 5.0 |