NVIDIA GeForce 940MX versus NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 706 MHz
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 23 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 57% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 3200 MHz
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.91 versus 24.487
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 103.937 versus 61.984
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2486 versus 1105
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 versus 1974
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3246
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2486 versus 1105
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 versus 1974
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3246
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 versus 23 July 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 706 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 3200 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 versus 24.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 versus 61.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 versus 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 versus 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 versus 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 versus 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3246 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 67.78 GTexel / s versus 23.83 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 384
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,627 gflops versus 762.6 gflops
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2772 versus 1516
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 325 versus 172
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8831 versus 6325
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 600.985 versus 312.94
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.281 versus 1.83
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.452 versus 27.833
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.78 GTexel / s versus 23.83 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,627 gflops versus 762.6 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2772 versus 1516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 versus 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8831 versus 6325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 versus 312.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 versus 1.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 versus 27.833 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1516 | 2772 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 325 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6325 | 8831 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | 24.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | 600.985 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | 2.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | 35.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | 61.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2486 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2486 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3246 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM108 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 28 June 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1071 | 1074 |
Genre | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Prix maintenant | $379.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 706 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1152 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.83 GTexel / s | 67.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management |