NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) versus AMD Radeon R9 M380
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 M380 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 67% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1670 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 versus 34.701
- 6.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 536
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 versus 2855
- 6.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 536
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 versus 2855
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 5 May 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 900 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 versus 34.701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 versus 2855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 versus 2855 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M380
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2774 versus 2456
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 versus 442
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12660 versus 9783
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.907 versus 170.785
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.618 versus 1.373
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.878 versus 18.937
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 versus 160.823
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3688 versus 3629
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3688 versus 3629
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2774 versus 2456 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 versus 442 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12660 versus 9783 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 versus 170.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 versus 1.373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 versus 18.937 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 versus 160.823 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 versus 3629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 versus 3629 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M380
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2456 | 2774 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 530 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9783 | 12660 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 34.701 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 546.907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 2.618 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 48.878 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 194.051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 2855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 2855 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1084 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | N17P-G1 | Strato |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 872 | 875 |
| Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48 GTexel / s | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
| Eyefinity | ||
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X300
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon RX 550
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon 540
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
AMDROG Ally Extreme
