NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 840M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 1029 MHz
- Environ 49% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1670 MHz versus 1124 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 33 Watt
- 3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 2002 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2433 versus 1096
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 versus 151
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 versus 5771
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 versus 22.848
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 170.785 versus 162.594
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.373 versus 1.237
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 versus 95.545
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 versus 2085
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 2736
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 versus 3191
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 versus 2085
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 2736
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 versus 3191
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 12 March 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 1029 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz versus 1124 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 33 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 2002 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 versus 1096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 versus 151 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 versus 5771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 versus 22.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 versus 162.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 versus 1.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 versus 95.545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 versus 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 versus 3191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 versus 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 versus 3191 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 versus 18.937
- 14.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 503 versus 35
Caractéristiques | |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 versus 18.937 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 versus 35 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce 840M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 1096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 151 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | 5771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 22.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 162.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 1.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 21.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 95.545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3191 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 | 503 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Nom de code | N17P-G1 | GM108 |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 12 March 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 874 | 1235 |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 33 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized |