NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM versus NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM and NVIDIA Tesla K20c pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 46% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1033 MHz versus 706 MHz
- 4.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 225 Watt
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 12 November 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz versus 706 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla K20c
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 146.8 GTexel / s versus 24.79 GTexel / s
- 6.5x plus de pipelines: 2496 versus 384
- 4.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,524 gflops versus 793.3 gflops
- Environ 25% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 5 GB versus 4 GB
- 2.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5200 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15597 versus 6117
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.423 versus 24.117
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1427.15 versus 335.835
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.128 versus 1.651
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.383 versus 27.096
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 179.044 versus 97.126
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 146.8 GTexel / s versus 24.79 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2496 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,524 gflops versus 793.3 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 5 GB versus 4 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5200 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15597 versus 6117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.423 versus 24.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1427.15 versus 335.835 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.128 versus 1.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.383 versus 27.096 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.044 versus 97.126 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | NVIDIA Tesla K20c |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2138 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6117 | 15597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 | 39.423 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.835 | 1427.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.651 | 4.128 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 | 64.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 | 179.044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | NVIDIA Tesla K20c | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM107 | GK110 |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 12 November 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1003 | 1005 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $3,199 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz | 706 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 793.3 gflops | 3,524 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2496 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.79 GTexel / s | 146.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 7,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 5 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 208.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |