NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp versus AMD FirePro W9000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp and AMD FirePro W9000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 6 GB
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 versus 84.462
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2621.94 versus 1734.394
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.26 versus 8.988
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 versus 460.234
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 versus 84.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 versus 1734.394 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 versus 8.988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 versus 460.234 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W9000
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.984 versus 34.491
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.984 versus 34.491 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9000
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 | 84.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 | 1734.394 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 | 8.988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.491 | 86.984 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 | 460.234 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6138 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 31775 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD FirePro W9000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 318 | 336 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | |
| Nom de code | Tahiti | |
| Date de sortie | 14 June 2012 | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $3,999 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 3840 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Vitesse du noyau | 975 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,994 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 124.8 GTexel / s | |
| Compte de transistor | 4,313 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | DisplayPort, HDMI | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.4 in | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 10.5 in | 279 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6-pin + 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.7 GB/s | 264 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 384 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
ATIFirePro V5700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370 LP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
AMDRadeon HD 8990 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
NVIDIAGRID K140Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 1024SP
