NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp versus AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp and AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Environ 58% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 375 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 2x 3 GB
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 versus 44.481
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2621.94 versus 1984.655
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.26 versus 8.536
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 versus 470.237
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 375 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 2x 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 versus 44.481 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 versus 1984.655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 versus 8.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 versus 470.237 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.504 versus 34.491
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.504 versus 34.491 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 | 44.481 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 | 1984.655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 | 8.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.491 | 125.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 | 470.237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 658 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5214 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 318 | 320 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | |
| Nom de code | Malta | |
| Date de sortie | 24 April 2013 | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 3840 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Vitesse du noyau | 950 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 4,096 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
| Pipelines | 2x 2048 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
| Compte de transistor | 4,313 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | DisplayPort, HDMI | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.4 in | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 10.5 in | 307 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6-pin + 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | 2x 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.7 GB/s | 2x 288.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 2x 384 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
ATIFirePro V5700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370 LP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
AMDRadeon HD 8990 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 1024SP
