NVIDIA GeForce MX230 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX230
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 47% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1519 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 5.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 3.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6740 versus 6108
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 445.82 versus 335.835
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.736 versus 1.651
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.43 versus 27.096
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 102.234 versus 97.126
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3309
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3309
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 18 February 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 55 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6740 versus 6108 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 versus 335.835 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 versus 1.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 versus 27.096 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 versus 97.126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 versus 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 versus 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3309 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2135 versus 1830
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 475 versus 214
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 versus 21.591
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 versus 2680
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 versus 2680
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2135 versus 1830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 475 versus 214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 versus 21.591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 versus 2680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 versus 2680 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1830 | 2135 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 475 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6740 | 6108 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 | 24.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 | 335.835 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 | 1.651 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 | 27.096 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 | 97.126 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 | 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 | 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Nom de code | GP108 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 18 February 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 981 | 979 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 55 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 1,870 million |
Performance á point flottant | 793.3 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.79 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s |