NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super versus NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1470 MHz versus 1304 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1650 MHz versus 1442 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 34% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 235 Watt
- 9.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1430 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16576 versus 16374
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 859 versus 847
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 87091 versus 84757
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.053 versus 25.191
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 165.463 versus 144.928
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1271.757 versus 1056.078
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 versus 16640
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 versus 16640
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 1 October 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz versus 1304 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz versus 1442 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 235 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1430 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16576 versus 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 859 versus 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87091 versus 84757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 versus 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 versus 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 versus 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 versus 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 versus 16640 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Environ 65% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 2176
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 355.937 versus 246.191
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4858.771 versus 3885.018
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 versus 5567
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 versus 5026
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 versus 5567
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 versus 5026
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 3584 versus 2176 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 355.937 versus 246.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 versus 3885.018 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 versus 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 versus 5026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 versus 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 versus 5026 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16576 | 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 859 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87091 | 84757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 | 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 | 4858.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 | 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 | 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 | 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 22133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 22133 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU106 | GP100 |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 1 October 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 145 | 87 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2176 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | 3584 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 235 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.8 B | 15,300 million |
Performance á point flottant | 10,329 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 322.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Longeur | 9.0” (228.60mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8 pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 921.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1430 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |