NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super versus AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- Environ 29% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 87069 versus 77153
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.053 versus 24.769
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 versus 14699
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 versus 3720
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 versus 3369
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 versus 14699
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 versus 3720
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 versus 3369
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87069 versus 77153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 versus 24.769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 versus 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 versus 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 versus 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 versus 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 versus 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 versus 3369 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1470 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1650 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16664 versus 16576
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 versus 859
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 versus 246.191
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 versus 3885.018
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 165.463
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 versus 1271.757
- 4743x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9486 versus 2
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1470 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1650 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16664 versus 16576 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 versus 859 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 versus 246.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 versus 3885.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 165.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 versus 1271.757 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9486 versus 2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16576 | 16664 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 859 | 927 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87069 | 77153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 | 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 | 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 | 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 | 254.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 | 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 9486 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | RDNA |
Nom de code | TU106 | Navi 10 |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 7 July 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $400 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 145 | 148 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz | 1905 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2176 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | |
Render output units | 64 | 64 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.8 B | 10.3 B |
Unités de Compute | 40 | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Longeur | 9.0” (228.60mm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 600 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8 pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |