NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super versus AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1650 MHz versus 1605 MHz
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19514 versus 16357
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 115804 versus 77476
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 338.122 versus 252.601
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4571.03 versus 3949.565
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.6 versus 24.769
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1653.08 versus 1322.129
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 versus 14699
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 versus 14699
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1650 MHz versus 1605 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19514 versus 16357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 115804 versus 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 338.122 versus 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 versus 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.6 versus 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 versus 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 versus 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 versus 14699 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1815 MHz
- Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 190.349
- 1067x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2134 versus 2
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1815 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 versus 920 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 190.349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 versus 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2134 versus 2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19514 | 16357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 | 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 115804 | 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 338.122 | 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 | 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.6 | 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 | 254.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 | 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 2134 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | RDNA |
Nom de code | TU104 | Navi 10 |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2019 | 7 July 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $400 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 110 | 162 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1905 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1650 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 3072 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Render output units | 64 | 64 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 225 Watt |
Unités de Compute | 40 | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | 600 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 496 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |